This is the Strange Darling moment: an early release from a brand-new specialty distributor, the kind of micro-budget specialty title that the wide-release-focused industry tends to wave off as untrackable. (A specialty release opens on a few hundred to a few thousand screens with a craft-forward marketing posture, as opposed to a wide release that opens nationally on 2,000+ screens with broad TV spend.) The read on this one was the cleanest, calmest in the archive: about a million bucks. That’s the whole expectation. No hedge, no range. Just the number.
Strange Darling
- Late-August micro-budget specialty wides historically: usually open in the low-to-mid six figures and fade
- 1100-screen launches without major TV: calibrated for a per-screen average in the hundreds, not thousands
- Strong-RT-but-quiet-marketing thrillers: a category that almost never breaks out wide, but occasionally does on word-of-mouth
The full Friday note that weekend was an essay on the LA/NY-vs-the-rest-of-the-country gap (Blink Twice’s $12M/$6M split, the ‘will it play in Peoria?’ question, the question of whether the industry was making movies only for the people the industry knows). Strange Darling didn’t make the public note; it didn’t have the screen count to. But the private read is the one a specialty distributor should study. It’s how the work actually gets done at this level.
“It’s about a billionaire sexual predator, and perhaps that idea doesn’t sound like a fun night out for areas outside of NY and LA… we have to think about who this is for, and needs to be for a few people outside of the 310 and 212 area codes.” [2024-08-23]